Category Archives: Based on a Book

Devices and Desires (1991)

From NetFlix:

Roy Marsden stars as Scotland Yard sleuth Adam Dalgliesh in this epic miniseries based on the popular mystery novel by P.D. James, a tale that also features a brief appearance by a young Kate Beckinsale. After inheriting a seaside cottage from his aunt, Dalgliesh escapes the city for a little R&R, only to find himself neck-deep in a string of serial killings. Can he expose the killer before his vacation is completely ruined?

Filmed in 1991, this 6-episode P.D. James mystery series can be streamed from NetFlix with subtitles. Somewhat ordinary, at least the story is neither gritty, grim, nor graphic.

Roy Marsden has played Adam Dalgliesh in many of these P.D. James book adaptations. As an extra treat we get to shudder at Gemma Jones’ cold steel-grays eyes.

Throw in some clandestine romances, some landlord-tenant grief, a struggling mother-less family with 3 children, and nuclear reactor intrigue and you get a watchable 6 hours of entertainment.

Life of Pi (2012)

From NetFlix:

Based on Yann Martel’s best-selling novel, this coming-of-age tale recounts the adventures of Pi, an Indian boy who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck. Pi finds himself on a lifeboat with only some zoo animals for company.

Based beautifully on the book, the photography alone is worth the price of admission. From the very first shot of unusual zoo animals, through a wild storm at sea, and accompanying Pi on his journey in a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger, the scenes are exciting and memorable.

Additionally the story is one of determined and remarkable survival. Pi finds a book amoung the lifeboat supplies a book that teaches him to survive shipwreck. He also learns to effectively train the tiger (or at least try to train the tiger).

There are some comic moments but certainly never a dull moment. Hang onto your oars!

Lincoln (2012)

From NetFlix:

Director Steven Spielberg takes on the towering legacy of Abraham Lincoln, focusing on his stewardship of the Union during the Civil War years. The biographical saga also reveals the conflicts within Lincoln’s cabinet regarding the war and abolition.

As soon as the film started I knew this was directed by Steven Spielberg even though I hadn’t realized that before the film started. How could I possibly criticize the work of a great director? However, taking advantage of my American freedom of speech I cannot fail to notice that his films are: long (this one logs in at two hours and thirty minutes), grandiose, possibly long-winded, and wear their hearts on their sleeves (dare I say “corny”?).

Once you get past that first scene in which black union soldiers personally berate Lincoln for the U.S. military discrimination against black soldiers and then walk away reciting by heart Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (honestly, I am not joking), then you will begin to realize that this film concerns almost exclusively the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment which abolished slavery.

Please read the rather long Wikipedia article which talks about Doris Kearns Goodwin and her wonderful book “Team of Rivals” which was the inspiration for the film. In fact you might want to read “Team of Rivals” which my wife Kathy read twice and still talks about. You might then appreciate more all those scenes of roundtable meetings with Lincoln talking to (arguing with ?, confronting ?) groups of importantly-dressed men. Lincoln cleverly surrounded himself with men who were not only his rivals but were adversaries with their other cabinet members. That is the point of “Team of Rivals”.

Listen to the language these politicians used. Although it may seem flowery, that is how educated people back then actually spoke. Words were important then as opposed to our current twitter-dumb manner of speaking.

At first I squirmed and then settled down to watch 2.5 hours that really zoomed by. As an capsule introduction to Lincoln and his times this film is worth watching.

The Sum of all Fears (2002)

From NetFlix:

Why are three missing Russian nuclear scientists holed up in the Ukraine, communicating with neo-Nazis? CIA agent Jack Ryan (Ben Affleck) digs up more information than the U.S. government is willing to accept. As bombs kill thousands in Chechnya and the U.S., Ryan races against time to prevent all-out nuclear war. Based on the novel by Tom Clancy, this high-intensity technothriller co-stars Morgan Freeman.

Apologies to Tom Clancy, but “ho hum, yawn yawn” – we have seen such a film many times before. Still, a plot to deceive the U.S. and Russia to engage each other in nuclear war has possibilities. What is amazing is that Jack Ryan (Ben Affleck) walks on water: he speaks Russian and Ukrainian; he is a Soviet expert; he is personal friends with the current head of Russia; and to top it all he is young and handsome. Darn!

And what fun planting a nuclear bomb in a full football stadium! Seeing a photo enactment of a nuclear bomb explosion and the resulting shock wave is impressive. Needless to say our superhero survives what the shock wave does to the helicopter he is flying (Oh, did I forget to mention he knows how to fly a helicopter?)

Except for the exciting fact that the wonderful city of Baltimore is mentioned often, I will say no more. Either watch this film or take a healthy walk outside.

Cruising (1980)

From NetFlix:

After a serial killer brutally murders several gay men in New York’s S&M and leather districts, cop Steve Burns (Al Pacino) goes undercover on the streets, where he must learn the complex rules of the underground gay subculture if he’s to catch the psycho. Karen Allen co-stars as Burns’s girlfriend in this gritty 1980 thriller, which sparked protests from gay rights groups at the time of its release but has since developed a minor cult status.

“Lurid” is the first adjective that comes to mind. The Stonewall riots occurred in 1959. By 1980 the gay movement was strong enough to protest this film which depicts an aberrant side of gay culture. Indeed the strong gay protests are described in the Wikipedia article about the film.

Expect “grungy” scenes in this cult classic with a wonderfully ambiguous ending.

The Bourne Legacy (2012)

From NetFlix:

Following the Jason Bourne debacle, the CIA finds itself dealing with a familiar threat when another estranged operative surfaces. Jeremy Renner stars alongside Edward Norton, Rachel Weisz and Joan Allen.

Cars chase motorcycles. Motorcycles chase motorcycles. At least this film is a notch better than Premium Rush.

We all cheer for the two real-life friends Matt Damon and Ben Affleck. But in my opinion Jeremy Renner (who played Sergeant First Class William James in The Hurt Locker) fits the role better than Matt Damon who strikes me as the nice kid next door. Notice in one quick moment we get a glimpse of a photo that is supposed to be a younger Renner. Of course the photo is of Matt Damon. There is no way Renner could be an older Damon.

Don’t worry if all those blue and green pills confuse you in the somewhat boring beginning of the film. Just hold tight and all will be explained.

Renner and Weisz play off one another quite well. This film was acceptable for kids because there is absolutely no sex, just tons of violence.

Seeing an older Edward Norton return to being the bad guy (remember him in “Primal Fear”?) worked for me. He is one cold fish. Why is the CIA often the villain in today’s new films?

If nothing else the special effects eye candy and the motorcycle stunts could be worth the price of admission. Once again I wonder how the stunts were filmed. Even the Wikipedia article does not talk about this aspect of the filming.

Let your inner kid just enjoy all the fun.

Lawless (2012)

From NetFlix:

This true-to-life action saga profiles Virginia’s bootlegging Bondurant gang, whose exploits during the Prohibition era made them outlaw heroes. The three Bondurant brothers tussle with the law and each other as they try to survive changing times.

Despite the unrelenting violence from start to finish, every other aspect is so well done that this film about bootlegging is strongly compelling. Much attention was paid to reproducing rural Virginia during the Prohibition era.

As far as acting is concerned Tom Hardy (age 35), Jason Clarke (age 43), and Shia LaBeouf (age 26) create a fascinating trio of Bondurant brothers, each with his own unique personality. “Chameleon” is a word I like to apply to an actor who loses himself in a part to such an extent that you almost do not recognize him. Here we have at least two “chameleons”: Tom Hardy took an light and fun part playing against Chris Pine in the film “This Means War” whereas in “Lawless” he has transformed himself into an almost silent, soft-spoken but menacing Forest Bondurant. Make no mistake: you WILL take Forest seriously or else. Guy Pearce (age 45) is the other “chameleon”. Because of his scary portray of Charlie Rakes as a violent psychopath, I am willing to finally give Guy Pearce his due. Many of his earlier films were often mediocre fluff. However, who could forget (or stop conjecturing about the plot of) “Momento”. Both Tom Hardy and Guy Pearce are British so we have to add accent skills to their credits.

For more background on the Bondurant family see the Wikipedia article about Matt Bondurant and his book “The Wettest County in the World”. Matt was the grandson of one of the three brothers.

Despite the violence, I would have to say DO NOT MISS THIS FILM!

The Hunger Games (2012)

From NetFlix:

In a dystopian future ruled by a totalitarian regime, resourceful Katniss and her partner, Peeta, represent their district in the lethal Hunger Games — a televised survival competition in which teenage contestants fight each other to the death.

After having read all three books in the trilogy, I am pleased with the film adaptation. Part of the fun is all the multi-colored eye candy realized by the Capital fops. Characters from the book really come alive. Never does the abject feeling of doom abate. Jennifer Lawrence (age 22) captures Katniss Everdeen to perfection. Woody Harrelson makes a wonderful Haymitch. Donald Sutherland is just right as the thoughtfully evil President Snow. Stanley Tucci as TV moderator couldn’t be any more of a superficial fake if he tried. Controlling effects from the Capital (sponsor gifts, induced forest fires, images of the dead in the sky, the cannons announcing yet another kill, tracker jackers) are done well.

What amazes me is that the author Suzanne Collins is a 50 year old woman who captures the constantly meditating persona of a 16 year old girl. In this film adaptation you do not hear the voice of Katniss constantly ruminating as you do in the book. As a result you have to infer her state of mind from what you see.

So you think this is just unrealistic science fiction?

  • What government would purposely starve its citizens? But that is precisely how North Korea (nominated by the Economist as the worst country on the planet) keeps its enslaved population in line.
  • What kind of people would cheer contesting combatants until one kills another? Consider the book Are We Rome? by Cullen Murphy. So far cage fighting has not yet reached this ultimate goal.
  • Could there possibly be in a country an ever growing separation of the impoverished from the upper One Percent?
  • Could such young people really be killers? Right now the psychotic African Joseph Kony is training his Lord’s Resistance Army of child killers.

Be aware that in the book, there is very little if any physical romance. No kissing!

Enjoy this first episode and expect further installments.

John Carter (2012)

From Netflix:

One minute, Civil War veteran John Carter (Taylor Kitsch) is evading Apaches in a deserted cave. The next, he’s waking up on Mars, a once-Earthlike planet that’s devolved into chaos — and civil war of a different sort. Based on Edgar Rice Burroughs’s classic “Barsoom Series,” this sci-fi adventure finds Carter coming to the aid of Martian princess Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins) and pitching in to help protect the planet.

Just as for any film in the tradition of “Star Wars”, “Avatar”, “Thor”, etc., the story line and emotions are for kids whereas the special effects will please many an adult. We will make no comment about the acting.

Who wouldn’t want to be able to leap over tall buildings, be the victor in every sword fight, and marry the beautiful princess? But isn’t that why we watch such entertainment?

Even though according to Wikipedia the film lost $200 million, just sit back and enjoy the mindless fun.

Red Dragon (2002)

From NetFlix:

This Silence of the Lambs prequel stars Edward Norton as former agent Will Graham, who was once nearly killed by the savage Hannibal “The Cannibal” Lecter (Anthony Hopkins) and now has no choice but to face him again. It seems Lecter is the only one who can help Graham track down a new serial killer, Francis Dolarhyde (Ralph Fiennes) — but can he be trusted? Emily Watson, Harvey Keitel, Mary-Louise Parker and Philip Seymour Hoffman co-star.

Seven well-known film stars come together to present a serial killer story that is positively unremarkable, but at least watchable:

  • Will Anthony Hopkins’ legacy be Hannibal Lecter? What a waste of talent. Let’s hope he is making a lot of money with this role.
  • What ever happened to the Edward Norton (Will Graham) of “Primal Fear”?
  • Philip Seymour Hoffman is perfect as a slimy newsman.
  • Emily Watson (the mother in War Horse (2011)) does well as a blind woman.
  • Harvey Keitel (detective) is best characterized by his role in “Pulp Fiction”
  • Mary-Louise Parker (Will Graham’s wife) was Amy Gardner in “The West Wing”
  • Cheers to Ralph Fiennes (the serial killer) who portrays well a tormented, abused person. Let’s hope that his full-back tattoo was somehow temporary.

You can always tell that a twist is coming when the plot seems to wrap up too easily. In this case the preparation for the twist to me seemed flawed without a believable explanation. Even the Wikipedia plot summary did not explain this detail.

In this film you see as much of the killer as you see of his pursuers.

If you are a Hannibal Lecter fan, you might want to add this film to your collection, just to be complete. Otherwise, it might be hard to think of a reason to watch this so-so film.